What Does cs executive company law case studies pdf Mean?
Extra username and password are needed for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details۔۔۔۔واقعاتی شہادت فوجداری قانون مین درجہ بندی کے لھاظ سے کمزور حیثیت رکھتی ہے۔۔۔ جب تک واقعاتی شہادت کی تمام کڑیاں اس طریقے سے فراہم نہ کی گءی ہوں کہ ایک متواتر زنجیر کی شکل اختیار کرے اور مقتول اور قاتل کے درمیان نہ ٹوٹنے والا سلسلہ قاءم کرے تب تک سزاےموت یا تعزیری سزا /عمر قید کسی کو دینا انصاف کے اصولوں کے منافی ہے۔
four. Record shows that the petitioner has become booked in as much as eight criminal cases under the same offence with different complainants and involving sizable amounts of money. These cases span over the years 2018 to 2020 and three cases have been registered after the registration of the instant case. Regardless that the petitioner has obtained bail in People cases, it does, prima facie, establish that the petitioner is at risk of repeating the offence.
twelve. There isn't any denial from the fact that in Government service it is anticipated that the persons owning their character higher than board, free from any moral stigma, are to be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is usually a condition precedent for appointment into a Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to the Government service may be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a means out or guise to carry out absent with the candidature of your petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 133 Order Date: 15-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
These past decisions are called "case regulation", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "let the decision stand"—will be the principle by which judges are bound to this sort of past decisions, drawing on proven judicial authority to formulate their positions.
eighty two . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 with the Constitution based within the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued for the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement from the FIR lodged by FIA and from the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
73 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Pertaining to the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 in the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice is not really served, the grievance petition may be dismissed. This is because service on the grievance notice is a mandatory necessity and also a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The regulation requires that a grievance notice be served over the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. In the event the employer fails to respond or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) When the organization is transprovincial.
Extra username and password are needed for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details
department concerned shall offer the complete set of ACRs on the concerned officer to DPC very well in advance cases for promotin(Promotion)
Therefore, this petition is found to become not maintainable which is dismissed along with the pending application(s), and the petitioners could seek remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
Criminal cases Within the common law tradition, courts decide the legislation applicable to a case by interpreting statutes and making use of precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. Compared with most civil law systems, common law systems Stick to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their individual previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all lessen courts should make decisions steady with the previous decisions of higher courts.
[3] For example, in England, the High Court plus the Court of Appeals are Every bound check here by their own previous decisions, however, Considering that the Practice Statement 1966 the Supreme Court of your United Kingdom can deviate from its earlier decisions, although in practice it hardly ever does. A notable example of when the court has overturned its precedent may be the case of R v Jogee, where the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom ruled that it and also the other courts of England and Wales had misapplied the legislation for approximately thirty years.
A coalition of residents sent a letter of petition into the Supreme Court to challenge the Water and Power Growth Authority’s (WAPDA) construction of an electricity grid station in their neighborhood, on designated “green belt” property. The Court heard the matter to be a human rights case, as Article 184 (three) of your Pakistan Constitution provides original jurisdiction towards the Supreme Court to get up and determine any matter concerning the enforcement of fundamental rights of public importance.
The decision further directed the government of Pakistan to ascertain a commission of internationally known and recognized experts to review and rule on foreseeable future grid station projects. In addition, the Court ordered WAPDA to immediately introduce public consultation and objection procedures for all projects concerning grid stations and power traces.